GETTING MY CASE LAWS 506 B PPC PRE ARREST BAIL TO WORK

Getting My case laws 506 b ppc pre arrest bail To Work

Getting My case laws 506 b ppc pre arrest bail To Work

Blog Article

The punishment prescribed under Section 302 PPC reflects the seriousness with which the Pakistani legal system views intentional murder.

In accordance with the EPA charge schedule, the request should be limited in scope, instead of be intended for redistribution to the internet or for commercial purposes. 

This Court might interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer within a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding reached via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your conclusion or finding is which include no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may possibly interfere with the conclusion or the finding and mold the relief to really make it ideal into the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is definitely the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-recognize the evidence or even the nature of punishment. To the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified through the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

Subscription access exclusively for organizations/businesses (SCC ID required) to criminal and traffic case information during the general district courts for that purpose of confirming an individual’s date of birth.

extended period petitioner wasn't deemed for promotion, meeting from the departmental promotion committee and think about the petitioner (Promotion)

Article 27 of your Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination with the time of appointment of service but after the appointment at the same time. The disparity in the spend scale allowances of Stenographers within the District Judiciary is inside the obvious negation in the law laid down through the Supreme Court in its a variety of pronouncements. Read more

In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the death penalty with the accused who intentionally murdered the target.

Electronic and paper court records retained at the court site is usually viewed with the courthouse for free, however there is often a price of ten cents for each page to print from a public access terminal.

P.C. Liability of petitioners for the reported offences would be determined by the learned trial Court after sifting the evidentiary worthy of on the material developed before the same. Till then, case of

I)       The above mentioned referred case FIR, for that murder of deceased namely Muhammad Sajjad, was registered within the complaint of Muhammad Sharif son of Ghulam Farid that's father of the petitioner and According to Tale of FIR, the petitioner is an eyewkness in the prevalence.

Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the load specified to any reported judgment could depend upon the reputation of both the reporter as well as judges.[7]

Regardless of its popularity, not many may be familiar with its intricacies. This article is an attempt to highlight the flaws of this section as well non cognizable offence case laws as very low threshold that governs it.

147 . Const. P. 479/2019 (D.B.) Waheed Akhtar V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi The petition regarding the upgraded post and fork out fixation are not entertainable with the reasons that this sort of matters are typically handled by administrative or service tribunals, as well as the legal grounds for this petition are inadequate as such this petition is dismissed, which will involve disputed claims and counterclaims on the topic post, therefore this court is just not inside a position to dilate upon these kinds of disputes in constitutional jurisdiction. Read more

The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary to the determination with the current case are called obiter dicta, which represent persuasive authority but will not be technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil law jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[4]

Report this page